Why musicians of today suck.

You’ll hear teenaged music enthusiasts around North America complain that so-and-so (pick any band popular today) sucks. Inspired by their favourite bands and musicians to learn to play the instrument of their choice (guitar for me), teenagers suddenly become the know-alls of the music world. They complain about how the members of this band (or that band... pick a card, any card ;) ) can’t even play the instrument they advertise themselves to play. The lead guitarist is weak, playing the same old lines that have been played for decades, merely changing an octave to make the song sound different than their previous hit. The rhythmic guitarist can’t hold a decent riff. The drummer has less sense of rhythm than a guy who can’t dance. The bassist plays the simplest lines, with the volume so low that the sound is lost in the chaos of the junk music it’s supposed to support. The lead vocalist can’t hold a note to save his life. Blah blah blah. Good for you, you can hear the rhythmic issues in a song. Perhaps you can also tell instantly who a new song is by, because (like a certain Canadian band that must be very fond of coinage) every damned song sounds exactly the same. Congratulations, you know nothing of the music business.

To know music is not to know the music business. One would think, certainly it’s common sense, that the two would be intertwined indefinitely. Unfortunately, this is not the case. You see, it has become entirely possible to become ‘famous’ for anyone, even those without talent. The days of talented guitarists, bassists, drummers, and singers have passed and we’re left with the undeniably popular crap of today. You see, people, as a whole, know nothing (or next to nothing anyways) about music. The average person with the radio cranked up as they drive to work in the morning doesn’t give a flying you-know-what about acoustics, melody, or harmony. They don’t care if the lead guitarist has a wicked 25 second solo in the middle of the song, or if the bridge flows aesthetically into the chorus. They honestly couldn’t care less what level of talent the individual musicians have. They merely want entertainment. People are different and yet so very much alike when it comes to music. There are a few types of people. There are you know-all self-proclaimed musicians out there that listen for aesthetically pleasing melodies, harmonies, riffs, solo’s, blending, distortion, beat, count, octaves, tune, notes, flow, hammering on, hammering off, high-low combinations, finger plucking vs. plastic plectrums vs. metal ones, can tell the difference between a soft, medium, and hard plectrums simply by listening, and care what make of guitar the dude is playing. There are those that listen for the lyrics alone, and couldn’t care less about the musical abilities of those performing the song, only expecting to feel something through the lyrics they take in. There are those that disregard lyrics altogether and just want a beat, usually the beat that is the simplest, that they can tap their toes to or bob their head along (*cough*mother*cough*). There are those that are tone-deaf and really can’t tell the difference between good and bad singing, and there are those that just like the song for how it makes them feel, period... perhaps it’s connected to some moment in their life, like a wedding, high school prom, or a favourite commercial for all I care, and it just reminds them of a time in their life that they enjoyed.

You look at those five groups and you know-alls will think you’re clearly the superior group. You look at it from the music world, from the perspective of a company executive, and you lot are the ones that get tossed under the bus. And this is where you’re ignorant to the music world. The music world is not about talent, it’s about money. The corporations look at the population as a whole and sees that the vast majority of people don’t care about a musician’s technical abilities. And so they don’t care. There is a band out there in the ‘popular culture’ world that immense numbers of people like, and the corporations see dollar signs. When a band comes in that is similar to that band, the little green dollar signs are floating around the exec’s heads, as their pupils change like a slot machine. Those record company executives can smell money from a mile away, and they will stop at nothing to keep their own personal economy running on high.

Now you smartass musicians in your little bands that are doing decently on the local scene think you can ‘make it big’ in the pop-culture universe. Come on, admit it... you’ve got plans of how you’re going to record a kick-ass demo and mail it out to all the big companies... Universal, Warner, Sony, Virgin, . Or maybe you’re one of those purists that doesn’t want to be part of that corporate trash you bitch about on a daily basis. In that case, you’re sending out to indie labels, many of which are actually run under one of those major labels I just listed. And here’s what you don’t want to hear... you don’t stand a chance at ‘making it big’. The major labels don’t want you because you don’t fit their standard cut out version of music... you’re too big of a risk for them. If they sign your band and no one buys your album, they’re out of a load of money, and you eventually get dropped. Unfortunately for you, you end up in debt to the company. I bet you didn’t know that the company doesn’t pay for those music videos, tours (busses included), recording studios, production and distribution. They lend you the money for those things, and then once your album starts selling and your tour sells out, they take that money out of what you’ve made. So let’s say your first album is out, and you do well. Guess what? You still haven’t got a dime to your name because that bloody corporation soaked you for most of it... you wanted that extravagant video, now you’ve got to pay for it. On the other hand, let’s say you manage to get signed to a major label, and they don’t force you to change your sound to fit the standard carbon copy style, and you somehow, surprisingly, don’t do well in sales. You’ve borrowed the money from the label to record your album, market it, make a sweet music video, and head out on tour, but you find that your sales have bombed, and the label drops you from its roster. You, my friend, have made no money, and now have to pay back that money that the label seemingly gave to you. Do I hear bankruptcy in your future? Ohhhh yes.

Perhaps you’ll get signed to an indie label that really liked your individuality and attention to detail. Unfortunately there is little money behind indie labels, and as such, you work much harder and often get nowhere in return. Your music videos are of lower quality and have fewer spectacular elements. The recording equipment isn’t as expensive, and you tour in a van you bought with your own money instead of a lavish tour bus. Marketing is less intensive, so sales are low, and your tours may never sell out. But you’re happy, because you’re making quality music, your way. Eventually you’ll give it up because there’s no money in it.

So feel free to complain about the quality of music today. But remember, everything that is ‘popular culture’ is run by those that are fuelled by greed. The music business is not about music, it’s about money. You may have more talent, but no one really cares what you think. You are the disposable audience... the execs will gladly sacrifice a few of you to gain the rest of the population’s approval. Thanks for staying true to music, but money makes the world go ‘round.

Success

I was going to save this entry for later, but something that someone said today brought it into mind and I figure I may as well post this now.

Success is defined in many different ways. By simply typing the word "success" into the search box at http://www.dictionary.com/, you are given a range of definitions, varying from 'the achievement of something desired, planned, or attempted' to 'a person or thing that is successful'. Obviously there is a difference betwee those two definitions... one describes an outcome and one describes an object that has succeeded. The most common definition of success in today's world is 'the attainment of wealth, position, honors, or the like'. When I say common I mean that if you pulled a random person off of the street and asked them to define success, that is what you are likely to hear as their response.

It's become the goal of many to succeed. To succeed in the work place, at sports, with money, and 'status', or rather, power. Unfortunately for most people, this type of success is often unatainable. No one wants to feel like a failure in any respect of their life, but I think that people's ideas of success and failure are too narrow and skewed to accurately reflect their lives. If a person has no money, they have failed. If a person owns a 5 million dollar home, they have succeeded. Live in a gated community by the 18 hole golf course? Success. Live in the trailer park with the worst yard in the area? Failure. Have a menial job pushing paper where no one knows your name, but your family and you can comfortably go on a trip each year? Failure. You're a failure because no one knows your name. Because you are not of 'status'.

In my opinion, the best definition of success is the one that simply says 'the act of succeeding', though it is often considered too broad of a definition, as it doesn't really describe success. A person that knows nothing of what it means to succeed will not understand this defintion. However, that is not the point. By giving success the definition of attaining power, wealth and honor, society has created a mindset that power and wealth are the most important achievements in life.

I wrote something a while back, in my attempts at deciding my future, educationaly, occupationally, and actions in general. To my surprise, I discovered something about myself in the process. I discovered my definition of success. I discovered what I want to succeed at and how I will do so. And I discovered my definition of failure.

One day I'll get around to posting some of the things I've written over the years, but I won't today. The gist of what I wrote that day is that success, to me, is following my dreams and passions. As far as failure, I stated

The only way you can truly fail, is to realize your dreams and passions, and not try to achieve them. Quitting doesn't equal failure, never trying does.

For me, success is trying to be the best I can be, and do the things I love. To live a life of happiness and love, and enjoy as much of it as I can. For me, that involves having a job I love, friendship, family, and contributing to society... making a difference. Success to most people is gaining. Gaining status, money, contacts. But to me, it's giving. Giving what I can to help those that need it. Wisdom is one thing that the world is in dire need of. Wisdom is the ability to see things from multiple perspectives and making the best decision to solve a problem. Most people see only one point of view, and as a result, decisions are rash, and not always the best for themselves, or for others. The point of this blog is to find different perspectives on many issues, situations, and matters of today's world. Through this blog I can succeed, in one way anyways.

The key to success is not to be better than everyone else, but to be the best you can be. You have to pick your success, what it is that matters to you. Happiness is what matters to me, but I also know that a lot of people just want that wealth, that power, and that status. So I suppose my point is that the definition of success is specific to each and every person. The one thing that is constant is that if you aren't trying to be the best that you can be, you aren't succeeding... settling is not success. So I repeat, the best definition of success is 'the act of succeeding', as useless as that definition really is.

So what is success to you? What matters to you?